TL;DR: Is my statement below incorrect? Are there in fact meaningful efforts to improve accessibility on Linux? Are there distros that people have actually used practically that make an effort to be accessible?
I have used desktop Linux on and off since 2009, mostly flavors of Ubuntu with occasional detours into things like Arch or CentOS (RIP).
I currently have Mint installed on a separate drive but I can’t fully break away from Windows because as a blind user the experience is not only unsatisfactory it has gotten worse in the years I’ve been using it. Orca hasn’t improved at all, and the magnifier has actually lost functionality at some point, my guess is the move away from GNOME 2. Among other things you used to be able to assign arbitrary modifier keys to zoom in and out with the mouse wheel but this is no longer the case.
I have little faith that things will improve. Any given Linux distro isn’t one product, it’s a bunch of different projects. One group makes the kernel, another makes the shell, another the window manager, yet another makes the desktop environment, audio, bluetooth, graphics drivers etc. All these make the assumption that the user is able-bodied, and bolting accessibility on top of all these disparate systems after the fact is very difficult. It’s no accident that MacOS and iOS are frequently cited as the most accessible platforms. Apple controls the entire stack from hardware to UI and even many of the apps and has the resources to devote to serving a comparatively tiny portion of their userbase.


My guess is about the same hope as for the world at large. [/Cynicism after some ongoing issues with the bank.]
Potentially even better hope, given it’s Free Software, where everybody’s free to mend it, using the 4 freedoms assuring we can use, study, share, change the software as we wish. … Albeit with some non-triviality involved.
A lot of itches being scratched… but do these successful efforts get shared and integrated upstream, and consistently re-availed? Keep raising awareness. Accessibility features are good even for those who do not have to rely upon them. The more this awareness gets around, the more reliably these features will be present more ubiquitously, and not just a niche implementation or after-thought.
“Anybody can become disabled at any time.”