• Iunnrais@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    A-list actors are superstar millionaires now, but learn about what they did to Judy Garland, and you’ll see that they only got there because of unionizing. The studios would be much happier to chew actors up and spit them out. They used to do this, all the time. The execs absolutely would prefer to pay actors crap and get all the money for themselves. Not just pay them crap, but lock them into incredibly brutal contracts and literally work them to death. It’s not speculation, it’s fucking history. They DID these things. Unionizing stopped them. They’ll go back to doing the things in a heartbeat if allowed.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      They are. A behind the scenes look at the Wizard of Oz shows why Hollywood needs unions. Precedent that affects Hollywood unions can easily affect all other unions. Not all of them are rich, either; in fact, a great many workers in Hollywood are just getting by in one of the highest cost of living areas in the US.

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        When you hear someone say “I support workers” you don’t exactly imaging them supporting some that gets paid millions to play pretend while 3 other people carry their coffee.

        • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Assuming every actor gets paid millions is no different than assuming every person who works downtown is a CEO.

          AI is not going to replace the CEOs or the A-list actors. It’s going to replace the forgettable workers at the bottom of the staircase, the ones people don’t even bother to imagine, so they can pay the A-listers extra. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. That’s how this economy works, always has.

          • remon@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Assuming every actor gets paid millions is no different than assuming every person who works downtown is a CEO.

            Yes, my bad for saying “actor” when I meant “hollywood star” like in the original comment.

            • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I hear you, and I’m not criticizing you, I’m just pointing out that the hollywood stars aren’t the ones we need to worry about, the whole premise is invalid. Hollywood stars will be fine, of course. It’s everyone else who won’t be.

        • PugJesus@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Most actors aren’t millionaires, and ‘playing pretend’ for a camera is no less work than playing pretend for corporate ghouls in an office.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I remember when I had to vote for anti-communist “conservatives” (christofascists in sheep’s clothing) to fend of “communists” (liberals calling themselves social-democrats), because they’ll force me to work hard manual labor for 12 hours each day, like in China…