Do you reset your own memory with every other new post? I laid that out in front of you several times now, I’m not going to put in more effort, so you can keep avoiding to address it. In short, you excuse dehumanizing language, rather then moderate it. Because you are in agreement.
You wanted to convince me that you’re not what I said you are, but you’re in the process of failing. Failing again, because you keep dodging and distracting. Shabby.
That’s what he does, tho. If I do bother complying, he wouldn’t engage with the actual arguments or critique. That’s what I’m referencing and that’s also why I won’t play that stupid game. Tried a few times, it’s a useless endeavour.
Okay, so, here, I bothered. Now show me how you’re not answering any of my arguments in regards to hate speech and distract from the inherent toxicity of your community, which you facilitate (might have to read context, don’t pretend the infos aren’t there):
Three cases, where I confronted you with that, every time you avoided positioning yourself and distracted. Within a couple of weeks, in an almost dead community. Maybe you should get your head checked, if you can’t remember these confrontations. Last time I’ll answer any of your “show me” questions as I regard them as unserious distractions now.
Let’s see how you’ll not do it again, this time. Am off for now, tho. Take your time, understand the critique, drink a tea, reflect, drink another tea.
The third one is not the same account. Is it the same user? You tell me, you’re the mod.
So you actually managed to do moderation stuff and banned the fascist for a whole week, congratulations. I am indeed a bit surprised, gj!
How did that came to be? Because every time I pointed out their language, you ignored it, even called me unhinged for articulating a thorough critique. So you didn’t act on the user spewing hate speech, but on the user confronting you with your ignorant inaction. I don’t see how you’re fit for the job, lol.
Regarding the third example: instead of acting on the hate speech for which the user got their comment deleted (they openly fantasized about scenarios on how to kill a whole group of people), you used your energy to smudge the meaning of ableism in order to defend their post complaining about it. You’re still a shady and dishonest human being. And I am sorry, but that’s what I’m getting from your behaviour.
So, what brought you so far to actually ban a fascist for a week, what did he actually say? Because the instances I showed you obviously weren’t bad enough for you to act on it.
Do you reset your own memory with every other new post? I laid that out in front of you several times now, I’m not going to put in more effort, so you can keep avoiding to address it. In short, you excuse dehumanizing language, rather then moderate it. Because you are in agreement.
You wanted to convince me that you’re not what I said you are, but you’re in the process of failing. Failing again, because you keep dodging and distracting. Shabby.
I don’t excuse dehumanising language, what do you mean?
Read my post history in this community, if your memory is really that bad. Stop bothering me with busy tasks.
But your memory isn’t that bad, right? It’s just the dumb distraction game you play when you’re confronted.
I invite you to be more honest with one another!
Bro said this when they start attack someone.
That’s what he does, tho. If I do bother complying, he wouldn’t engage with the actual arguments or critique. That’s what I’m referencing and that’s also why I won’t play that stupid game. Tried a few times, it’s a useless endeavour.
but i am. i asked what hate speech am i allowing and your response is that I already know what hatespeech I’m allowing :v
Okay, so, here, I bothered. Now show me how you’re not answering any of my arguments in regards to hate speech and distract from the inherent toxicity of your community, which you facilitate (might have to read context, don’t pretend the infos aren’t there):
Round 1, Round 2, Round 3
Three cases, where I confronted you with that, every time you avoided positioning yourself and distracted. Within a couple of weeks, in an almost dead community. Maybe you should get your head checked, if you can’t remember these confrontations. Last time I’ll answer any of your “show me” questions as I regard them as unserious distractions now.
Let’s see how you’ll not do it again, this time. Am off for now, tho. Take your time, understand the critique, drink a tea, reflect, drink another tea.
Those are all from the same user, whom I have since punished.
The third one is not the same account. Is it the same user? You tell me, you’re the mod.
So you actually managed to do moderation stuff and banned the fascist for a whole week, congratulations. I am indeed a bit surprised, gj!
How did that came to be? Because every time I pointed out their language, you ignored it, even called me unhinged for articulating a thorough critique. So you didn’t act on the user spewing hate speech, but on the user confronting you with your ignorant inaction. I don’t see how you’re fit for the job, lol.
Regarding the third example: instead of acting on the hate speech for which the user got their comment deleted (they openly fantasized about scenarios on how to kill a whole group of people), you used your energy to smudge the meaning of ableism in order to defend their post complaining about it. You’re still a shady and dishonest human being. And I am sorry, but that’s what I’m getting from your behaviour.
So, what brought you so far to actually ban a fascist for a week, what did he actually say? Because the instances I showed you obviously weren’t bad enough for you to act on it.