Here’s a long-winded diatribe just for you. I hope your attention span will manage.

with each and every person

Everyone … in this thread, in which you inserted yourself? Bohoo. After I was offline for a couple of hours, iiiimagiiine that!

All you managed until now is complain and showcase your self-proclaimed lack of imagination.

Figure this: You’ve got no devotion, imagination for other perspectives, because all you do is consume western viewpoints in the few hours of each day, in which you are free not to fight for your existence. But imagine that, there‘s a whole world out there, and there do exist diverging opinions. I know, it‘s hard when you‘re trapped in capitalist realism (there‘s a book on that, a suggestion).

And you use the time to hang out with fascists and wanna-be fascists, ranting about a perceived enemy, the authoritarian left. Dude, you’re off the deep end.

Btw, which country am I devoted to, please tell me! China? Because I don’t put up with goat’s bullshit? You might just be an idiot.

Authoritarian opinions are not worthy of being discussed. Just like I don’t give two fucks what a Nazi says, I also give no fucks what authoritarians say.

That’s an unworthwhile authoritarian opinion.

So you’re of the enlightened centrist kind of flavor, equating nazism or fascism with communism, believing in horse shoe theory, fearing anything too far off of status quo?

What’s your idea how fascism rises? What is your utopia? Why are you participating in a community based on gossip, propaganda and on hate towards an outgroup? Where is your engagement against right wing extremism? Or is it the left in particular and your commentary about nazis was merely lip service?

How many months old does my account have to be, before you stop talking like a conspiracy theorist?

And why do you think “If you like them so much, why don’t you go live there?” is in any way some kind of clever stance? Don’t you like dissenting opinions? You want them gone?

It’s true, that quite a few comments are here, it’s because you’re all such a reasonable bunch of nice folks. I want to know what makes you tick — it’s a bleak picture, tho.

Thanks for your comprehensive answer, lol.

The third one is not the same account. Is it the same user? You tell me, you’re the mod.

So you actually managed to do moderation stuff and banned the fascist for a whole week, congratulations. I am indeed a bit surprised, gj!

How did that came to be? Because every time I pointed out their language, you ignored it, even called me unhinged for articulating a thorough critique. So you didn’t act on the user spewing hate speech, but on the user confronting you with your ignorant inaction. I don’t see how you’re fit for the job, lol.

Regarding the third example: instead of acting on the hate speech for which the user got their comment deleted (they openly fantasized about scenarios on how to kill a whole group of people), you used your energy to smudge the meaning of ableism in order to defend their post complaining about it. You’re still a shady and dishonest human being. And I am sorry, but that’s what I’m getting from your behaviour.

So, what brought you so far to actually ban a fascist for a week, what did he actually say? Because the instances I showed you obviously weren’t bad enough for you to act on it.

Okay, so, here, I bothered. Now show me how you’re not answering any of my arguments in regards to hate speech and distract from the inherent toxicity of your community, which you facilitate (might have to read context, don’t pretend the infos aren’t there):

Round 1, Round 2, Round 3

Three cases, where I confronted you with that, every time you avoided positioning yourself and distracted. Within a couple of weeks, in an almost dead community. Maybe you should get your head checked, if you can’t remember these confrontations. Last time I’ll answer any of your “show me” questions as I regard them as unserious distractions now.

Let’s see how you’ll not do it again, this time. Am off for now, tho. Take your time, understand the critique, drink a tea, reflect, drink another tea.

Dude, it’s alright, this is getting too dumb now. You cherrypick the most irrelevant point and it’s not even a good counter.

The fact that you always end up boring me to death, leaves me thinking, that you are indeed just really, really ignorant and maybe, just maybe not a propagandist. Hooray.

I’m saying that your “independent” label is worth nothing.

No, I’m saying you’re a funny guy.

That’s what he does, tho. If I do bother complying, he wouldn’t engage with the actual arguments or critique. That’s what I’m referencing and that’s also why I won’t play that stupid game. Tried a few times, it’s a useless endeavour.

I wonder if you actually read the stuff you link. I guess not, because it’s enough to look valid and well sourced in order to satisfy your loyal users. The few.

Just so it‘s clear: You posted an RFA article to spread some sinophobic propaganda. That‘s what I critiqued in the first paragraph of my inital answer. There were a couple more paragraphs.

But we‘re really busy now going back and forth on a validity of the claim if RFA is a US propaganda tool. And that‘s not even a controversial statement. But you‘ve got nothing and you need to cling onto that point.

Anyway, you know what else is independent? The CIA. You wouldn‘t argue that they are acting independent from or against the interests of the US of A, wouldn‘t you?

As mentioned previously in the Wikipedia article you linked it’s clear, that Trump thinks they‘re a hindrance to his power grab, because the Board was stacked with Biden appointees.

The insteresting part however is, how you need to twist yourself to argue that this media outlet is not what it was meant to be from its inception. That‘s just ridiculous and lays bare your propgandist nature. You‘re denying facts and not the first time, tho, so there‘s a pattern.

RFA was established by the US International Broadcasting Act of 1994 with the stated aim of “promoting democratic values and human rights”, and countering the narratives and monopoly on information distribution of the Chinese Communist Party, as well as providing media reports about the North Korean government.

The other interesting part is, how you try to uphold any validity of US law or moral standards, which since Trump started his second term are under attack from the current autocratic and fascist reconstruction. You. Are. A. Ridiculous. Propagandist.

To guarantee the freedom and impartiality of RFA, there is the USAGM and the firewall and laws.

Or really just stuck cognitively, a useful idiot, if you really believe that.

And I‘ll call you out on it, any time I‘m bored and see your dumb takes.

Why you asking me about internal US affairs? The actual question is how it’s independent, if their financials are in direct dependance of the US government? What would you call a Chinese or Russian media outlet openly funded by their own governments? Oh, because democracy vs authoritarianism? lol. You keep embarrassing yourself, again.

It’s a rhetorical question, tho. The actual actual question is, why is that the one thing you get stuck on, when I gave you so much more to talk about. And you accompany it with some very nice “look what the tankies do” yapping.

Do you’ve actually got something?

Kay, thanks for the feedback, I guess.

Consider this: I’m not an alt. I spent more time writing with your favorite mod here, than I did reading or writing stuff on .ml. Because he’s a dishonest red scare propagandist fishing for libs. Now process this: You’re in a reactionary, progagandist community with a slant for hate speech towards people you deem political opponents. Nice place to hang out in, really.

Read my post history in this community, if your memory is really that bad. Stop bothering me with busy tasks.

But your memory isn’t that bad, right? It’s just the dumb distraction game you play when you’re confronted.

I invite you to be more honest with one another!

Well, how about you not ask them for an answer? Ask your orange turd, maybe.

At least they’re open about their direct congressional funding. Not sure what else to call it other then propaganda.

The lawsuit asserts that denying funding for RFA, which comes through grants administered by the U.S. Agency for Global Media, or USAGM, violated federal laws, including the U.S. Constitution, because only Congress has exclusive power over federal spending

goat, I’m disappointed. I give you so much to engage with and that dumb take is what you pick? lol.

Cool.

Radio Free Asia is a US propaganda tool. Nice source. Also interesting that they asked a Taiwanese professor of all people. So the suppression angle is not credible.

Corrupt planners, which seemingly are at fault here, IMO point towards greedy opportunists, trying to make a quick buck.

But you reeaally try to imply “China bad”. Why would you hone in on that so specifically, when it wasn’t part of the discussion. How about you move your ass over there and post your clever feedback directly under the original post, instead of cowardly spewing sinophobia in your little hate community?

Their mod also gave a solid reason for the deletion and if you would have bothered, you’d include the several comments in opposition to Semi’s low effort spam comment with lots of actual information. He’s not coming out well from this, as he’s just commenting dumb shit without actual content. Ya, congratulations for showcasing your dumb ignorance, Semi. But alas, goat, you’re not interested in that, because you are a dishonest little propagandist, aren’t you?

I’d really prefer you to be more open about your role.

Do you reset your own memory with every other new post? I laid that out in front of you several times now, I’m not going to put in more effort, so you can keep avoiding to address it. In short, you excuse dehumanizing language, rather then moderate it. Because you are in agreement.

You wanted to convince me that you’re not what I said you are, but you’re in the process of failing. Failing again, because you keep dodging and distracting. Shabby.

How would trying to convince people in your reactionary community be any good use of anyone’s time? I tried convincing you not to facilitate hate speech and other inhuman rhetoric, but you seem unwilling or unable to comprehend these simple concepts.

Would you, for once, approach their perspective with genuine good will and interest, I’m sure many of them would be happy to engage. You aren’t, tho. So why would they? There’s nobody to convince.

Also, just to clarify, since you seem to feel like your little hate bubble is important enough for others to use alt accounts or actually troll, my account is not an alt and when I engage with you, I try not to troll. But I’m also not really them. I just seriously want to see, if that’s all there is to your persona.

Why do you even suggest they should bother, when you are the ignorant one? Because you are a dishonest and spiteful poor soul. Please bother to convince me otherwise.