I want to start telling all these companies to leave me the f*** alone. I bought their product and I didn’t complain I didn’t return it. Isn’t that good enough for them??

  • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    People are more motivated to leave reviews when they aren’t happy because that’s how they get even, so the company is trying to convince everyone else to also leave reviews.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Also why tf are phone numbers required for every online order now?

    What if i don’t want to have a phone number? These forms refuse VoIP numbers as well.

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      I don’t know for other people but in my area the delivery person almost always calls me before dripping the package to check if I’m home and ready to receive the package.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because at some point someone said “if we have multiple ways to get in contact with our customer, we’ll be able to tell them about problems with their order faster.” And then it became industry standard, and everyone upstream of the order also wants a phone number, and so if you don’t put a mandatory phone number field in your form anymore, all the other ecommerce developers will laugh at you and call you mean names.

  • zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Lucky you, I get asked to leave a review before delivery on the regular. One company called me after leaving a negative review, asking why I would do that when the goods weren’t even delivered.

  • 7EP6vuI@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    8 hours ago

    how do you buy stuff online? do you read reviews on the big shopping platforms?

    back in the day reviews were a good and honest way to find out if a product is usable. the idea was that normal people do honest reviews and other people can use that as a guidance.

    this was probably true for some years, until the system got rigged: users were payed to take bad reviews offline, or users are payed to post good reviews. simple products with good reviews got exchanged with cheap complex products, so the reviews seemed to be for that product.

    what you see is one part of this system: a seller is asking you to do free advertisement for them.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I assume they’re fishing for data and active email accounts. If someone replies with a review, they know it’s an active, monitored email address and can sell it for a better price.

    Block and delete.

    • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No, the sellers already have the email address, that’s how they ask for reviews. It is simply the way the current internet works: reviews are king, but if the bought thing works as expected most people don’t leave a review, while people with problems are much more likely to leave a bad review. So sending an email asking for reviews is cheap as hell and one of the easiest way to boost their reviews, because if even only every 10th person leaves an “everything is fine”, that boosts their numbers immensely. And after 1 or 2 weeks, chances are that the big draw backs and failures didn’t manifest yet. So also increasing the good to bad review ratio.

      • tal@olio.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        if the bought thing works as expected most people don’t leave a review, while people with problems are much more likely to leave a bad review

        That’s a good point, though maybe a better way for retailers to deal with that would be to use the percentage of sold items that are associated by a review as an input into a ranking. I mean, maybe “no reviews, lots of items sold” should be used to indicate that an item is favorable rather than neutral.

        • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Interesting idea, never thought about it. But I don’t think the sellers would like to put that information out into the public. Many things, for example also tax related, doesn’t incentives sellers to openly report such information. Except if it is a publicly traded company, than they must report it in their reports.

          • tal@olio.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah, there’s some value to sales information.

            considers

            Amazon does provide some information.

            goes to Amazon, picks a random product

            https://www.amazon.com/HANPOSH-Military-Stopwatch-Waterproof-Chronograph/dp/B0CGX3SBJF

            3K+ bought in past month

            That’s a bit limited, but camelcamelcamel already scrapes Amazon for price history, and so even if they aren’t already grabbing sales volume history, my guess is that Amazon exposing this is probably already functionally exposing a fair bit of information about sales history.

            checks camelcamelcamel

            https://camelcamelcamel.com/product/B0CGX3SBJF

            Nothing about sales volume, so if they are scraping that as well, they aren’t currently exposing it to users. But I imagine that they could. It may be that competitors or various manufacturers in the industry already look at this to get some idea of what consumer demand is like.

            And just the quantity of reviews will expose some data about sales volume. I mean, if an item has 15k reviews, then they’re going to have sold more than 1000 units.

      • Vanth@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Fair, but I still think an email address they got a response from is of higher value for them to sell than an unmonitored junk email address as well.

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Good user reviews simulate word of mouth advertising which is the most valuable sort. They want free labour from you to help with that. This would be a great application for a spam filter.

    • chisel@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Is leaving a review really free labor? I view it more as community building. Nobody has reviews shoved down their throat without asking, they are sought out and helpful for the consumer. And so sellers like reviews because consumers like reviews and it makes them more likely to patronize their business.

      I enjoy leaving good reviews. Helps my fellow humans find quality things that I enjoyed and helps the business I like make more things I like. It’s a win win win situation. This is especially true for small business, many of which live or die on reviews.

      • grte@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s definitely free labour. Even if you don’t mind doing it, it’s still that. As for the rest, I’m sympathetic to your point of view. I have used reviews and occasionally left reviews on products I liked particularly. However, online reviews are so gamed at this point that I don’t think anyone ought to feel pressured to leave a review like they try to do with the emails OP is receiving. It’s one thing to like a product so much you are moved to leave a review. It’s another to be asked for it every time you purchase something.

  • cally [he/they]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    get an email address just for spam, which you can mostly/fully ignore, and use your main email only for more important things.

    alternatively, if giving them your email is completely unnecessary, use a throwaway like one of those “10 minute email” things.

    i haven't tested the functionality below:

    i think some services support writing your email as username+<text goes here>@provider.url so you can do username+spam@provider.url and the mail will appear in a separate folder in your email client.

  • BougieBirdie@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The market is saturated with crap that doesn’t sell under its own merits. In theory a review signals that not only did that product sell, but somebody actually cared enough to leave a review.

    An online market is especially tricky for consumers because you can’t really look at the product to judge it for yourself. You have to make do with a product description, specifications, or photos. All of which might be incomplete, poorly translated, or photoshopped / AI-generated.

    So reviews tell you what other people thought. It’s their first line of marketing after SEO (Search Engine Optimization). Of course, unethical companies are out there using paid and fake reviews, so it’s not like a savvy shopper can even use the reviews to judge quality.

    Anyway, as someone else said, don’t engage with these emails. You’ll just end up with more emails if you do.

  • cdzero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If they want reviews on any service that relies on an algorithm it is to improve their rating and therefore visibility. Advertising essentially.

    • chisel@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I never trust reviews on first-party sites. However, reviews on other sites can be very helpful. Maybe not yelp lol.

      • ArtemZA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I still find ratings/reviews on Amazon to be at least somewhat useful. A horrible product generally won’t have a 4.8-5.0 rating

        • chisel@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          By “first-party” here, I mean sites that make the product they’re selling. Like I wouldn’t trust the reviews on Samsung’s website for a Samsung phone. Amazon is separate enough that the conflict of interest isn’t really there, but Amazon reviews are so targeted by illegitimate reviews that they’re not S-tier trustworthy.

          • ArtemZA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Ah, makes sense then. I was considering Amazon as first party but now I see that I am wrong because this concept of buying directly from the producer was a bit alien to me

  • Its called continuous development. Or data driven business strategy. Its all about getting mass amounts of data for a range of products seeing what people like and don’t like and refining/improving to make it better. That’s just the way to stay ahead of the Darwinian marketplace of consumerism.

    Its a loop of make, get feedback, refine, remake, repeat. Forever cos line must go up.