The volunteer, tasked with security for the march and later identified as Matt Alder, saw Gamboa assembling a legally owned, legally carried AR-15-style rifle near the march in downtown Salt Lake City on June 14. Alarmed, Alder called for another volunteer security guard before drawing a concealed handgun. As Gamboa tried to rejoin the march, Alder opened fire, hitting Gamboa and killing Ah Loo.
Immediately after the shooting, police arrested Gamboa on a murder charge. The arresting officer claimed that Gamboa’s actions had created the situation that caused Alder to fear for his life and the lives of others, prompting Alder to open fire.
As a result Gamboa was blamed for Ah Loo’s death for having “acted under circumstances that showed a depraved indifference to human life, knowingly engag[ing] in conduct that created a grave risk of death and ultimately caused the death of an innocent community member,” according to a police statement.
Gamboa was held without bail for five days under suspicion of committing a violent felony. Police briefly detained Alder but did not take him into custody.
I linked it above, conveniently at the top of this thread so I don’t have to type it all out.
edit: If you don’t want to read the news, hate the suggestion of reading the news, and believe people are wasting your time by telling you to read the news, this may not be the right community for you.
Well that’s telling isn’t it?
Also I think you need to work on your reading comprehension. No one ever said I didn’t read anything. Were you not reading the usernames? Maybe you need to do a little bit more practicing what you preach.
It’s easy to tell when someone didn’t read an article when you’ve read the article. Yes, I know who I’m talking to.
Okay, well, sorry to see you go. Good luck out there.
Yes you’re right it is easy to tell when someone didn’t read the article. Like for instance when someone asked them a question about a specific point of the article and they can’t give one for four comments in a row. Yes very easy to tell. Agreed.
Lol. I’m OP, I posted it.
I don’t encourage laziness.
With all the time you spent arguing with me you could have read the article — and saw that the very next sentence after the blurb makes our friend leopard’s point moot.
All right at the risk of wasting another five comments of pointless dribble I have to ask. How did information that was included in the title of the post change the point they made?