

Hey me too!


Hey me too!


“meant to protect children”
What nonsense. Reuters really is failing at journalism more and more.

Don’t fight back says bully.


When it is given to a woman who actively encourages War and brags about wanting to become a new Pinochet then yeah that’s probably accurate.


Seems kind of weird to be doing live updates about this topic still. At a certain point don’t you just move to, you know, regular news?


I got to say I’m pretty shocked this was allowed to happen in today’s America and I’m more shocked the Speaker of the House spoke positively about it.


No she wasn’t.


Then why would you resign?


What is the virtue of live updates for a story like this? It’s going to involve a court case from which we will neither have details nor proceedings for months. Short of he’s been charged there’s literally nothing to learn now other than baseless speculation.


All right at the risk of wasting another five comments of pointless dribble I have to ask. How did information that was included in the title of the post change the point they made?


Yes you’re right it is easy to tell when someone didn’t read the article. Like for instance when someone asked them a question about a specific point of the article and they can’t give one for four comments in a row. Yes very easy to tell. Agreed.


Well that’s telling isn’t it?
Also I think you need to work on your reading comprehension. No one ever said I didn’t read anything. Were you not reading the usernames? Maybe you need to do a little bit more practicing what you preach.


Well if there’s so many that’ll be pretty easy to give me an exact example like I asked for. How were they misled exactly?
Also I will freely continue to downvote comments that waste my time because they don’t actually address anything.


Shouldn’t the lesson here be not to hire trigger happy security guards who murder people because of a hunch? That really seems like the better lesson. Shocked that’s not what you took away from it.


How was that user misled exactly? What details are they leaving out?


Does it matter if they’re responsible anymore? We’re talking about companies that have become so titanically large and so obscenely rich that there’s literally no way to challenge them for any normal person. Not even to mention the extreme level of capture and Corruption of the justice system. Does Jeff Bezos or Mark Zuckerberg or whoever else we’re talking about have to worry about anything if at the drop of a hat they can just turn to an Administration that will sabotage any possible retribution?


If you’re able just buy it like this shouldn’t I be able to sell mine?


Oh we are well well past that.


He’s going to take a big bribe for them then he’s going to let Paramount screw them over anyway.
I don’t understand how they’re still taking bets on this Administration. It’s so clearly being fixed. What was that one the other day about the press secretary ending her conference early to win a bet? Surely they know they’re getting taken advantage of. Unless this is just another form of bribery I guess.