• ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Take the one thing Android has over Apple away. Why go Android then? Might as well go with the device that has close ties to the hardware. Guess we are going back to the days when only nerds that knew how to flash better roms will be using Android.

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Many are going even further. Both my friend and I are planning to get dumb flip phones next. Forget also this smartphone always online stuff

      • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s not a bad idea.

        Why not completely divorce your phone from your portable computing device?

        Before smartphones, they were getting pretty small. You could probably make a phone that was just a voice activated earbud now. Then have a device that was everything but the “phone” bits. You wouldn’t have to accept the locked down aspects that the cell providers demand, you could have all the variety and functionality of your home computer or laptop.

        • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          In the U.S you can’t buy any of these devices because the cell networks are privately owned and one of the unofficial conditions of you getting access is that you have to have government surveillance and soon censorship on your device, as well as locked bootloaders with signing and stuff. They are currently spending tons of money in Europe to get rid of freedom of thought over there as well. You guys might have 10 more years.

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            In the U.S you can’t buy any of these devices…

            No. My Father in Law has one and they’re available from Verizon, AT&T, and others.

            …and one of the unofficial conditions of you getting access is that you have to have government surveillance and soon censorship on your device…

            Where are you getting this disinformation from?

    • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Guess we are going back to the days when only nerds that knew how to flash better roms will be using Android.

      Will we even have that? IIRC, Google’s changing the open source model for Android so its going to be a lot harder from ROM devs to keep up to date with security patches, and then more importantly, have access to device drivers

  • Southrydge Freedom@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ive had grapheneOS for years, is every customer android rom done for? I may just get a “dumbphone” or maybe back to iphone? I wish I could just have no phone but obviously need close family to contact me at anytime

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, this is terrible garbage, but if Google is going to fully ruin Android then at least the news being out might push resources towards mobile Linux faster.

    I’m actually using an old iphone. I look at it like an appliance to connect with mainstream institutions (including local people like other school parents), and take pictures. I have other appliances of varying complexity up to and including my car that run systems I know nothing about as well. I’m not happy about that either, but these are the compromises that happen in the real world.

    The closed system isn’t appealing to me, but the mass market appeal of the device is. A stunning majority of my direct acquaintances use it. It can streamline interactions sometimes.

    And you know, I don’t trust them of course, but at least Apple has actually said out loud in high profile presentations that privacy is a fundamental human right, and they always point out when they can keep personal things on-device. And they fight orders to unlock phones. Plus they make their money on hardware sales and services for the most part.

    Google, on the other hand, exists pretty much solely to vacuum up data and keep us online and cloud-connected. They typically get major points for interoperability from me, but then I ask how often is it just a cynical embrace/extend/extinguish strategy?

    Any big mainstream phone now is just a locked down disposable product of a megacorp. It’s also a data scraping tendril of said megacorp loaded with sensors and a fast data connection. And now as a bonus for those of us in the US - it’s probably a convenient backdoor warrantless wiretap that the oligarchs can just accidentally forward the government the passwords to.

    My COMPUTER runs Linux. I can’t wait until I can have a real linux computer in the form factor of a high quality phone.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        it is not secure for modern threat models… even of basic normie. unlocked bootloader with ice around is unacceptable.

        • Bootloader is for defence against Evil Maid, and Afaik, ICE is just gonna snatch you, not do a “Evil Maid” attack, so just get it rebooted before you get taken and they shouldn’t even be able to decrypt it since its BFU. (You’ll need a long password/passphrase tho since PIN Limits can be bypassed because bootloader is unlocked)

          Edit: Also reboot your phone before going to sleep in case you get raided midnight.