

Most people’s definition: anything fun and silly because apparently adults aren’t supposed to have fun or something
Mine: acting like someone who hasn’t learned basic knowledge or developed empathy
Most people’s definition: anything fun and silly because apparently adults aren’t supposed to have fun or something
Mine: acting like someone who hasn’t learned basic knowledge or developed empathy
Not cool bro
I’m not your buddy, pal!
No, that user is just a jackass. There are a fair number of jackass mods and admins across instances, but far fewer than I was expecting.
Not entire groups of people based on generalizations.
Depends on the group. If the basis for the group identity is being criticized, that is valid. If there is institutional problems, criticizing the group for being complicit is valid.
It is only invalid when the criticism is aimed at generalizations that apply to less than half of the group, or are based on inaccurate stereotypes.
The vast, vast majority of people are forgotten within 100 years. Pretty much need to be in an extremely high position where records are kept, like presidents, or do something extraordinarily positive or negative.
I strongly doubt anyone reading this post will be remembered after the people they met or interacted with directly have died.
I would buy another Toyota Camry. Had a 2005 model for almost two decades and in that time I had to replace the alternator and then the radiator got a hole in it right before we traded it out for a different type of vehicle.
Would have kept it if we had enough room to park it, as it was still in great condition and everything still worked including the A/C.
Same, but a lot of people treat them as the same thing and only in the negative way.