azuth

What license did they change to that is not open source?

Probably froze and is trying to keep ua macho persona

Attribution is required by the (A)GPL and is standard in forks. What is not required is preserving branding and logos.

For a good reason, those are often trademarks. Had they included them Only office would sue them for trademark violations.

It’s a dishonest attempt to override the FOSS license.

And the world is slightly a better place.

No. He was a soldier, volunteered to be one and put his life on the line. The girls didn’t.

Where did I say a malware injected GrapheneOS image will pass hardware attestation?

The problem is that an unmodified GrapheneOS image may also not pass hardware attestation if the app developer has not whitelisted GrapheneOS’s key.

Also I hope GrapheneOS would simply inform the user or refuse to boot if the image does not pass attestation. In that case an app itself requiring attestation, based on it’s own list of accepted keys, has no security value, only gatekeeping potential.

Hardware attestation verifies that the phone and the OS its running on are real and not an emulator or a fake malware laced version.

No, it verifies that the phone is running an approved OS. If the app developer does not add your OS’ keys it will fail. This included GrapheneOS.

We have been web banking for decades on platforms without hardware attestation. The potential for anti-competitiveness abuse is not worth it.

It also does not protect the user. If your system is actually compromised they can simply replace the app, not allow it to run etc. I don’t see how it protects the user if they chose to run an emulator, what exactly is the threat to the user there?

The EU is not doing anything in this, it’s some private companies.

It should do something though, forbid banks and other essential services from imposing arbitrary requirements for providing service.

Even GrapheneOS is not as insane to suggest ebanking should be restricted to locked down platforms.

EU should ban banks from requiring hardware attestation and other “security” excuses to refuse serving people.

Fucking moron.

I’m simply pointing out that California is part of a wider country therefore some problems can’t be solved by local California legislation. The law must become stricter in the rest of the country as well, though not necessarily as strict as the strictest state.

Better border control. Oh wait, California is not a country, so focusing on it’s state laws is misleading when it’s part of a country that has quite lax gun laws in some parts.

I am not familiar with Hyprland. It does seem you can (possibly have to) put the layouts in hyprland.conf, as well as set keyboard shortcuts instead of using hyprctl.

input {

kb_layout=us,fa

kb_options=grp:win_space_toggle

}

If you set them with localectl you should check for the proper code with localectl list-keymaps. There is no ir code in my system, only fa.

What exactly do you mean by not switching properly if you install with fa?

Only if Google makes such sweeping changes to make forward-porting the feature impossible.

Why would it be more difficult to maintain and update a complex system?

They don’t have to accept outsider contributions on their mainline nor employ less people to work on it.

You don’t get to redefine open source. It’s always been about giving the source code to whoever you give the software.

Making it publicly available is an acceptable alternative to fulfill that obligation.