It wasn’t snark, but mild confusion. If my response was snark, then your question prompting it could be interpreted as condescending brag. Compounded now by the seemingly absurd attempt at justification by claiming some people go through the effort of creating & providing needless non-paywall archive links just because they can. Never mind the arrogant, self-righteous tone.

Whatever. This is pointless. Chao.

Probably to pat Winnie the Pooh on the back, and say “good idea - if they talk back just jail 'em & take their money!”

Can’t imagine why I’d have commented with that otherwise.

Paywall-free archive version.