How can people that stupid? I’m aware that finding cases under that anglo-saxon law system is critical and hard work, and that you can turn around if you can find a prior case that you can cleverly adapt to a case. So use the AI to find potentially applicable cases, and check them personally if they fit.

But letting AI invent cases that can easily be falsified as non-existing and putting them in a court document is peak stupid for a lawyer. The 10k punishment is actually on the low side what I’d suggesst for this. And it better results in a disbarment for repeat offenders.

On top of that, the person or company that this lawyer misrepresented in this case should also sue him for misconduct.

Because he considers the word pro an issue. Did this idiot ever consider that in some communities ‘bro’ is even considered a sign of respect?

Not that I would respect some snowflake that obviously is wrongly placed in an admin position.

Over thirty years ago, on TALK.