You must log in or # to comment.
The more interesting part is that all baseline code generated by all LLMs is vulnerability ridden mess.
is this with or without the prompt including politically sensitive topics?
Without.
It’s pretty clear that deepseek is not open source, or at least shouldn’t be considered within the spirit of open source.
It seems like if we want to have truly open source llms, a new standard for transparency is needed.
Check out Apertus , the Swiss are showing how it should be done. 100% open: architecture, training data, weights, recipes, and final models all publicly available and licenses Apache 2.0. https://ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2025/09/press-release-apertus-a-fully-open-transparent-multilingual-language-model.html
