https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/reality-check-eu-council-chat-control-vote-is-not-a-retreat-but-a-green-light-for-indiscriminate-mass-surveillance-and-the-end-of-right-to-communicate-anonymously/

By “shared” servers I mean hosters like https://tchncs.de/en/ who offer a bunch of services (they do a great job at it by the way) including Matrix and Lemmy.

I’m thinking of moving my close family to a Matrix chat over there, but I guess long term they might have to implement the ChatControl scanning.

This whole thing is just stupid.

  • Blaze (he/him)@piefed.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I want to avoid messaging apps that will be scanned. Seems likely that Signal will be part of it.

    In the risk analysis, providers must check whether their services can be misused for the dissemination of abuse material or for contacting children. There are to be three categories for this: high, medium, and low risk. Providers in the highest category could be obliged to participate in the development of risk mitigation technologies.

    We can anticipate Signal and co. will be part of the high risk category and assume the risk mitigation tech will be aimed towards breaking encryption. Especially since this new agency will be interfacing with Europol. I don’t see this as a win or even a draw.

    https://feddit.org/comment/10169945

    you’re a pair of trustworthy cryptography experts using secure devices at both ends.

    As a lot of people here, I’m usually the IT/tech reference person in my family, so if I suggest to move to DeltaChat or Matrix, I’ll just take their devices, set it up and we’ll use that from now.

    I have been looking at a real WhatsApp alternative, this was the last push I needed.

    • whoever loves Digit@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Moving away from WhatsApp might reduce how many people can access your messages, but you can still assume your messages will be scanned and indexed no matter what app you use

      • Blaze (he/him)@piefed.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’m actively looking at used Pixels with GrapheneOS installed, they aren’t that pricy these days, but even without those already getting rid of the app-level scanning would be an improvement.

        • Noxy@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If you get a Pixel with GrapheneOS preinstalled, please please PLEASE do your own fresh installation of GrapheneOS anyways. You can’t trust what some third party may have done with it before you get it.

          • Blaze (he/him)@piefed.zipOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Of course, that’s the plan. Having it preinstalled is just to make sure the device was able to run it before I reinstall myself.

          • Blaze (he/him)@piefed.zipOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            It’s definitely going to be context-based:

            • I don’t mind getting used Pixels for my parents and my sister
            • DeltaChat allows to create several profiles, so I can at least have one profile dedicated to chats with my family where everyone uses a secure device
            • for other stuff, I accept that it will be scanned, but it’s less critical