He thinks it is unrealistic to expect lawyers to stop using AI. It’s become an important tool just as online databases largely replaced law libraries and, until AI systems stop hallucinating fake information, he suggests lawyers who use AI to proceed with caution.
“In the meantime we’re going to have some victims, we’re going to have some damages, we’re going to have some wreckages,” he said. “I hope this example will help others not fall into the hole. I’m paying the price.”
Here’s an idea: how about re-reading the brief and double-checking the citations?! Stupid fuck.
$10,000. Not much of a fine to a lawyer.
Then I have bad news for him: OpenAI admits AI hallucinations are mathematically inevitable, not just engineering flaws.
Here’s an idea: how about re-reading the brief and double-checking the citations?! Stupid fuck.
This is only a problem until judges start using GPT to respond as well. Then all will be good.
And by that I mean entirely fucked, but I mean * points around madly *