• Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Is there anyone arguing against dinosaurs being birds anymore? This was still a relatively new thought to the general public when Jurassic Park came out, but IIRC, it was pretty well accepted among paleontologists even back then. More people try to badly argue that Pluto is a planet than try to say dinosaurs aren’t birds.

    • beneeney@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I feel like revoking Pluto’s planet status was just uncalled for. Like, I doubt anyone consulted Pluto about its feelings on the matter. If anything we should’ve gotten it right the first time, instead of demoting the poor thing. Sorry, Pluto.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This is the other way around. There are some who want to push back the definition of “bird” to include more dinosaurs via earlier divergence. There are even a few that argue that certain conventially non-avian dinosaurs are actually from the agreed bird lineage but converged back on a bipedal dinosaur shape.

      • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I believe that, nowadays, it is generally accepted that dinosaurs, crocodilians and birds are all “archosaurs”. In a similar way to how Australopithecus, Humans and Chimpanzees are all “hominids”.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You do see it sometimes, where people complain that dinosaurs are no longer fearsome giant lizards because we found out that they might have feathers and aren’t SUV height, on social media and places.

      It generally becomes obvious that they have never met a goose, chicken, or been at risk of swooping before.