• minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    And cars have cameras and flock has cameras and ring has cameras and TVs and monitors and microphones everywhere. Its insane ppls are bitching so much about these glasses when they let Google home listen to everything inside their home. Almost like it’s being fueled by competitors, rather than actual ppl.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      and flock has cameras

      USA issue

      and ring has cameras

      Luckly i never saw one where i live but anyway, i remember that there was a huge backlash against them some time ago

      TVs and monitors

      What sort of TVs you buy? Smart TVs? They stull don’t have a camera but that’s a skill issue if you buy one

      insane ppls are bitching so much about these glasses when they let Google home listen to everything inside their home.

      Jokes on you, i don’t have one and i removed Google Assistant from my devices lol, i also don’t see why it’s a problem to bitch about yet another camera around our streets

      Are you a Meta employee or sum?

    • NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I doubt it would be someone who also bought a pervert car and a pervert tv and a pervert doorbell and bugged their own home that would then bring up this problem with the pervert glasses.

      What kind of competitor are you talking about?

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Where exactly are you able to buy non pervert cars?

        There’s also no good TVs that aren’t perverts either

        • Fluke@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The EU actually made it illegal to sell non pervert new cars, IIRC.

          • NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I honestly think this is more of a problem than the pervert glasses at this point. Park next to Tesla: smile, you’re on Nazi-cam. Even noticed an EV Mercedes had a front facing camera recently, because it was parked outside pointing directly in my windows. I guess that’s OG Nazi-cam.

      • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Meta competitors. The fact you swallowed the “creep glasses” pr narrative and now want them banned is ridiculous given the creepy ass shit all these companies are already doing. Like, google home is listening to all your private conversations FFS, but that’s less creepy?

        • NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          If you re-read my comment you’ll see I made no distinction between the levels of creepy in all the pervert devices.

          But, I can simplify for you: it’s true that having a company/government spy on you is expected in this day and age, but that doesn’t mean it is acceptable. Home devices can be avoided if you care for your privacy. People buying camera glasses and wearing them in public, willingly turning themselves into walking IPTV cameras controlled by one of the shadiest data scooping companies in the world, are the very definition of useful idiots.

            • NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Well, as you ignored that I just did it for like 4 different whole things which all existed before the Meta x RayBan Childsnappers, then I guess you’ll just keep creating your own conflicting narrative as a direct reply. So, sure, I’ve never called any technology creepy before.