• XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Proton is currently sponsoring the far-right French YouTuber Vincent Lapierre.

      https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Lapierre

      It’s not just an affiliate link, but a partnership announced in the description and through an entire 2min 20s segment embedded in the video.

      Vincent Lapierre’s Wikipedia page is quite explicit about his far-right positioning and includes numerous sources. He worked for several years for a far-right organization founded by Alain Soral, which promotes anti-Semitic, Holocaust-denying, conspiracist, sexist, masculinist, transphobic, and homophobic ideas, and who fled to Russia to escape justice.

      https://www.reddit.com/r/degoogle/comments/1tzbizh/proton_is_funding_the_french_far_right_on_youtube/

      • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not a partnership. It’s a normal sponsor segment. Leave it to a right winger to lie about their affiliations.

            • XLE@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I find it all to be very strange.

              Proton pays Vincent money for a sponsorship.

              According to you, Vincent defames Proton.

              Proton doesn’t seem all that worried about the defamation.

              • Feyd@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                3 days ago

                I think it is easily believable that it was a single sponsorship and Vincent used the word partnership without even thinking about it, and I also find it easily believable that the sponsorship is something that slipped through the cracks rather than having any meaning, and I find the response from Proton to be acceptable. I just don’t think it is as big a deal as you’re wanting it to be ¯_(ツ)_/¯

                • XLE@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  I think it is easily believable that it was a single sponsorship and [a man who makes a living on being a political pundit] used the word partnership without even thinking about it

                  So suddenly the narrative went from Vincent lying, to Vincent making a whoopsie. Odd how fast this stance softened.

                  • Feyd@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I literally know nothing about Vincent other than that he’s a bad dude. I just find the scenario as it has been laid out believable. If it becomes a pattern then I’ll join you with my pitchfork.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah that’s why LurkingLuddite said “it’s not a partnership. It’s a normal sponsor segment. Leave it to a right winger to lie about their affiliations.”