There may be an age or generational explanation for this, but I especially notice this behavior on Reddit while not nearly as much here on Lemmy (though maybe that’s also a mater of implementation).

It seems many are so quick to assert overly-confident positions, but then hit-and-run with some smarmy remark at even the slightest challenge, then quickly block. Like, not even crazy stuff. Just basic, civil disagreements. I can pretty well predict when it will happen, and it always feels like such a petty ego-sparing fingers-in-ears denial thing to do, and to me if anything shows they were not very confident in their views being challenged.

I think I’ve only blocked a handful of people over a decade who were actively spamming, stalking, or spewing extremely hateful rhetoric and I just reported them simultaneously. You have to cross a pretty extreme and irrational line for me to do that.

The reason I ask is to see if I’m missing something; to better understand the mindset of those who do.

  • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    People are trying to ‘win the argument’ for personal satisfaction. They’re not trying to self-correct or seek the truth.

    I think I’ve only blocked a handful of people over a decade

    I’m the opposite; I have hundreds of people blocked, mostly because they are bores.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t know about this “winning” theory.

      Generally, people feel like they’ve won when they get the last word in. If you block someone, you don’t see their replies and assuming they do reply to your last comment, they would get the last word.

      Personally, I block people when I realize there’s no point in continuing the conversation. I’m not trying to win an argument, I’m just over it and don’t want to interact with their toxicity.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Another aspect of this that I’ve found is that engaging in benevolent smalltalk with someone here on Lemmy somehow sometimes results in them treating it as an argument.

      No, I will not concede to whatever point you’re trying to make; I was making conversation, you were trying to win an argument. I don’t care if you’re convinced your particular approach to a particular problem is better than mine.

      And if they then don’t realize that I’m not interested in engaging, and keep the “debate me bro” attitude, they usually end up on my blocklist, or at the very least they end up with a red tag behind their name.

    • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Reddit made that change where if you blocked someone they couldn’t reply to you in a thread.

      That was quickly weaponized so that you could ‘win’ an argument. Someone could write something and your reply would not appear, so it looked like you realized you were wrong.

      • lennybird@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Only way around this is editing your previous comment, though I’ve been told that can sometimes lead to a ban? Never happened to me though.

        What really annoys me about that is that it prevents you from replying to anyone ELSE who replies to you in that thread, which is completely absurd.