right, sorry, i took know about to also be upset about as a given
edit: no, hold on i think i get it. how do you do strikeout? what i mean is you must already think something is bad in general, in abstract, before you think it’s bad that your kid is exposed to it. you are probab;y allowed to find the immediate issue (your kid enjoying epstein jokes) worse than the wider issue (epstein etc etc) when raising your own kids
how could they be upset about it without knowing the monsters it depicts? if a hypothetical kid was playing gaza clicker you couldn’t take offence without knowing the real life counterpart
oh shit, some kid playing club penguin: execute bin laden edition is really controlling a neuralink marine
i also just played five nights at epstein’s. for a couple of minutes anyway, i couldn’t be arsed to figure it out but the instructions are funny at least. excerpt:
Night 3 – Stephen Hawking
He remains stationary at Camera 6 and is immune to all audio lures
Task: You must electrocute him
anyway there might have been a crumb of something in this beyond think-of-the-children, as we expect parents to monitor their kids internet use at home, so it’s reasonable to expect access from school computers to be monitored similarly. but the school did that, they’ve blocked it now, what else do you want from them? it will get hosted elsewhere, they’ll add that to the blocklist too, life will go on and there’ll be some other thing to be pointlessly outraged about
the article obviously skirts around it but it’s clear in the video: https://www.tiktok.com/@mrsbonafide/video/7432702894178077995
see ‘diddying’